mirror of
https://github.com/mollyim/webrtc.git
synced 2025-05-13 22:00:47 +01:00
Deflake simulcast flow tests: prevent negative Timestamp exception.
These tests often fail in 'ExtrapolateLocalTime' because the result gives a negative Timestamp. Here is the stack from https://chromium-swarm.appspot.com/task?id=6173230e67897b10: PC: @ 0x7f03afdb8e87 (unknown) raise ... @ 0x55f4a360ba71 352 webrtc::Timestamp::operator+() @ 0x55f4a47ecaf3 160 webrtc::TimestampExtrapolator::ExtrapolateLocalTime() Low-Coverage-Reason: coverage isn't that low. Change-Id: If3e7cbf31d6c4800727b24352ed2c6edc425fc73 Bug: webrtc:15022 Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/300600 Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Brandt <brandtr@webrtc.org> Commit-Queue: Jeremy Leconte <jleconte@google.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39853}
This commit is contained in:
parent
c087d0cce5
commit
06e2148889
2 changed files with 28 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -132,13 +132,24 @@ absl::optional<Timestamp> TimestampExtrapolator::ExtrapolateLocalTime(
|
|||
constexpr double kRtpTicksPerMs = 90;
|
||||
TimeDelta diff = TimeDelta::Millis(
|
||||
(unwrapped_ts90khz - *prev_unwrapped_timestamp_) / kRtpTicksPerMs);
|
||||
if (prev_.us() + diff.us() < 0) {
|
||||
// Prevent the construction of a negative Timestamp.
|
||||
// This scenario can occur when the RTP timestamp wraps around.
|
||||
return absl::nullopt;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return prev_ + diff;
|
||||
} else if (w_[0] < 1e-3) {
|
||||
return start_;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
double timestampDiff = unwrapped_ts90khz - *first_unwrapped_timestamp_;
|
||||
auto diff_ms = static_cast<int64_t>((timestampDiff - w_[1]) / w_[0] + 0.5);
|
||||
return start_ + TimeDelta::Millis(diff_ms);
|
||||
TimeDelta diff = TimeDelta::Millis(
|
||||
static_cast<int64_t>((timestampDiff - w_[1]) / w_[0] + 0.5));
|
||||
if (start_.us() + diff.us() < 0) {
|
||||
// Prevent the construction of a negative Timestamp.
|
||||
// This scenario can occur when the RTP timestamp wraps around.
|
||||
return absl::nullopt;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return start_ + diff;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -127,12 +127,25 @@ TEST(TimestampExtrapolatorTest, NegativeRtpTimestampWrapAround) {
|
|||
ts_extrapolator.Update(clock.CurrentTime(), rtp);
|
||||
EXPECT_THAT(ts_extrapolator.ExtrapolateLocalTime(rtp),
|
||||
Optional(clock.CurrentTime()));
|
||||
// Go backwards!
|
||||
rtp -= kRtpHz.hertz();
|
||||
// Go backwards! Static cast to avoid undefined behaviour with -=.
|
||||
rtp -= static_cast<uint32_t>(kRtpHz.hertz());
|
||||
EXPECT_THAT(ts_extrapolator.ExtrapolateLocalTime(rtp),
|
||||
Optional(clock.CurrentTime() - TimeDelta::Seconds(1)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(TimestampExtrapolatorTest, NegativeRtpTimestampWrapAroundSecondScenario) {
|
||||
SimulatedClock clock(Timestamp::Millis(1337));
|
||||
TimestampExtrapolator ts_extrapolator(clock.CurrentTime());
|
||||
uint32_t rtp = 0;
|
||||
ts_extrapolator.Update(clock.CurrentTime(), rtp);
|
||||
EXPECT_THAT(ts_extrapolator.ExtrapolateLocalTime(rtp),
|
||||
Optional(clock.CurrentTime()));
|
||||
// Go backwards! Static cast to avoid undefined behaviour with -=.
|
||||
rtp -= static_cast<uint32_t>(kRtpHz * TimeDelta::Seconds(10));
|
||||
ts_extrapolator.Update(clock.CurrentTime(), rtp);
|
||||
EXPECT_THAT(ts_extrapolator.ExtrapolateLocalTime(rtp), absl::nullopt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(TimestampExtrapolatorTest, Slow90KHzClock) {
|
||||
// This simulates a slow camera, which produces frames at 24Hz instead of
|
||||
// 25Hz. The extrapolator should be able to resolve this with enough data.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue