Instead of using PacketTransportInternal::SignalReadPacket.
Bug: webrtc:15368
Change-Id: Icdc2d7f85df6db944f0ba0232891e6c5a8986a66
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/340440
Commit-Queue: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#41823}
Rework transport_description_factory to only have non-DTLS mode for
testing, and rewrite tests accordingly.
Bug: webrtc:11066, chromium:804275
Change-Id: Ie7d477c4331c975e4e0a3034fbbb749ed9009446
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/336880
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#41697}
This is a reland of commit 02b5f3c9c1
without making SetRemoteFingerprint private (but adding a deprecation warning)
Original change's description:
> dtls: allow dtls role to change during DTLS restart
>
> which is characterized by a change in remote fingerprint and
> causes a new DTLS handshake. This allows renegotiating the
> client/server role as well.
> Spec guidance is provided by
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5763#section-6.6
>
> BUG=webrtc:5768
>
> Change-Id: I0e8630c0c5907cc92720762a4320ad21a6190d28
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/271680
> Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Philipp Hancke <phancke@microsoft.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37821}
Bug: webrtc:5768
Change-Id: I8dd674db8b683160013e1b4aa7776775d130978f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/272221
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Philipp Hancke <phancke@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37838}
This reverts commit 02b5f3c9c1.
Reason for revert: SetRemoteFingerprint called by downstream code.
Original change's description:
> dtls: allow dtls role to change during DTLS restart
>
> which is characterized by a change in remote fingerprint and
> causes a new DTLS handshake. This allows renegotiating the
> client/server role as well.
> Spec guidance is provided by
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5763#section-6.6
>
> BUG=webrtc:5768
>
> Change-Id: I0e8630c0c5907cc92720762a4320ad21a6190d28
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/271680
> Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Philipp Hancke <phancke@microsoft.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37821}
Bug: webrtc:5768
Change-Id: I266b7fdc9cc0b6dc9d3fa732fca37407b98e0816
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/272220
Owners-Override: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Bot-Commit: rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37822}
which is characterized by a change in remote fingerprint and
causes a new DTLS handshake. This allows renegotiating the
client/server role as well.
Spec guidance is provided by
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5763#section-6.6
BUG=webrtc:5768
Change-Id: I0e8630c0c5907cc92720762a4320ad21a6190d28
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/271680
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Philipp Hancke <phancke@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#37821}
This cl/
1) move WebRtcKeyValueConfig from api/transport to api/ directory.
2) add a test/ScopedKeyValueConfig (compare ScopedFieldTrials).
3) removes usage of webrtc::field_trial:: from the pc/ directory.
4) removes a few unused includes of system_wrappers/field_trial.h.
Bug: webrtc:10335
Change-Id: If29c07900dbe791050b0a5ad05332bedfad035f2
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/253903
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#36160}
Also apply IWYU to all .cc files in pc/, and correct BUILD file to match.
Note: Some files came out wrong when iwyu was applied. These are not included.
Bug: none
Change-Id: Ib5ea46b8fcc505414d0447cca7218ad3afc2e321
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/252280
Reviewed-by: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#36064}
Add implementation of RTC_DCHECK_NOTREACHED equal to the RTC_NOTREACHED.
The new macros will replace the old one when old one's usage will be
removed. The idea of the renaming to provide a clear signal that this
is debug build only macros and will be stripped in the production build.
Bug: webrtc:9065
Change-Id: I4c35d8b03e74a4b3fd1ae75dba2f9c05643101db
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/237802
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#35348}
Removes the ability to accept nonencrypted answers to encrypted offers.
Fixes some logic around bundled sessions and requirement for
transport parameters.
Bug: webrtc:11066
Change-Id: I56d8628d223614918a1e5260fdb8a117c8c02dbd
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/236344
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#35298}
This reverts commit 37ee0f5e59.
Reason for revert: Revert in order to be able to revert https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/225642
Original change's description:
> Use backticks not vertical bars to denote variables in comments for /pc
>
> Bug: webrtc:12338
> Change-Id: I88cf10afa5fc810b95d2a585ab2e895dcc163b63
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/226953
> Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34575}
TBR=hta@webrtc.org,titovartem@webrtc.org,webrtc-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com
Change-Id: I5eddd3a14e1f664bf831e5c294fbc4de5f6a88af
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:12338
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/227082
Reviewed-by: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Björn Terelius <terelius@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34577}
Uppercase constants are more likely to conflict with macros (for
example rtc::SRTP_AES128_CM_SHA1_80 and OpenSSL SRTP_AES128_CM_SHA1_80).
This CL renames some constants and follows the C++ style guide.
Bug: webrtc:12997
Change-Id: I2398232568b352f88afed571a9b698040bb81c30
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/226564
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34553}
This is essentially replacing `new rtc::RefCountedObject` with
`rtc::make_ref_counted` in many files. In a couple of places I
made minor tweaks to make things compile such as adding parenthesis
when they were missing.
Bug: webrtc:12701
Change-Id: I3828dbf3ee0eb0232f3a47067474484ac2f4aed2
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/215973
Reviewed-by: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33852}
This patch fixes a problem in https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src/+/71ff07369837d6575c04ebff7002d07d6e0af25f
that when adding standard compliance validation of ufrag/pwd
accidentally broken ice renomination by introducing a new "constructor".
Bug: chromium:1044521
Change-Id: If1b18b1d728e55db9da385b37162a9cb5e61ac48
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/169549
Commit-Queue: Jonas Oreland <jonaso@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Magnus Flodman <mflodman@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30670}
MediaTransport is deprecated and the code is unused.
No-Try: True
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I5b864c1e74bf04df16c15f51b8fac3d407331dcd
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/160620
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Gustaf Ullberg <gustaf@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Åsa Persson <asapersson@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29923}
This is a reland of 487f9a17e4
Original change's description:
> Reland "Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface."
>
> Also clears SctpTransport before deleting JsepTransport.
>
> SctpTransport is ref-counted, but the underlying transport is deleted when
> JsepTransport clears the rtp_dtls_transport. This results in crashes when
> usrsctp attempts to send outgoing packets through a dangling pointer to the
> underlying transport.
>
> Clearing SctpTransport before DtlsTransport removes the pointer to the
> underlying transport before it becomes invalid.
>
> This fixes a crash in chromium's web platform tests (see
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1776711).
>
> Original change's description:
> > Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface.
> >
> > This change moves SctpTransport to be owned by JsepTransport, which now
> > holds a DataChannelTransport implementation for SCTP when it is used for
> > data channels.
> >
> > This simplifies negotiation and fallback to SCTP. Negotiation can now
> > use a composite DataChannelTransport, just as negotiation for RTP uses a
> > composite RTP transport.
> >
> > PeerConnection also has one fewer way it needs to manage data channels.
> > It now handles SCTP and datagram- or media-transport-based data channels
> > the same way.
> >
> > There are a few leaky abstractions left. For example, PeerConnection
> > calls Start() on the SctpTransport at a particular point in negotiation,
> > but does not need to call this for other transports. Similarly, PC
> > exposes an interface to the SCTP transport directly to the user; there
> > is no equivalent for other transports.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9719
> Change-Id: I64e94b88afb119fdbf5f22750f88c8a084d53937
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/151981
> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29120}
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I28481a3de64a3506bc57748106383eeba4ef205c
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/152740
Reviewed-by: Artem Titov <titovartem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Seth Hampson <shampson@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29290}
This reverts commit 487f9a17e4.
Reason for revert: speculative revert
Original change's description:
> Reland "Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface."
>
> Also clears SctpTransport before deleting JsepTransport.
>
> SctpTransport is ref-counted, but the underlying transport is deleted when
> JsepTransport clears the rtp_dtls_transport. This results in crashes when
> usrsctp attempts to send outgoing packets through a dangling pointer to the
> underlying transport.
>
> Clearing SctpTransport before DtlsTransport removes the pointer to the
> underlying transport before it becomes invalid.
>
> This fixes a crash in chromium's web platform tests (see
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1776711).
>
> Original change's description:
> > Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface.
> >
> > This change moves SctpTransport to be owned by JsepTransport, which now
> > holds a DataChannelTransport implementation for SCTP when it is used for
> > data channels.
> >
> > This simplifies negotiation and fallback to SCTP. Negotiation can now
> > use a composite DataChannelTransport, just as negotiation for RTP uses a
> > composite RTP transport.
> >
> > PeerConnection also has one fewer way it needs to manage data channels.
> > It now handles SCTP and datagram- or media-transport-based data channels
> > the same way.
> >
> > There are a few leaky abstractions left. For example, PeerConnection
> > calls Start() on the SctpTransport at a particular point in negotiation,
> > but does not need to call this for other transports. Similarly, PC
> > exposes an interface to the SCTP transport directly to the user; there
> > is no equivalent for other transports.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9719
> Change-Id: I64e94b88afb119fdbf5f22750f88c8a084d53937
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/151981
> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29120}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,mellem@webrtc.org,benwright@webrtc.org
Change-Id: Ibd1a7f30931c114212c90824fec414d276d3f915
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:9719
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/152421
Reviewed-by: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Qingsi Wang <qingsi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29141}
Also clears SctpTransport before deleting JsepTransport.
SctpTransport is ref-counted, but the underlying transport is deleted when
JsepTransport clears the rtp_dtls_transport. This results in crashes when
usrsctp attempts to send outgoing packets through a dangling pointer to the
underlying transport.
Clearing SctpTransport before DtlsTransport removes the pointer to the
underlying transport before it becomes invalid.
This fixes a crash in chromium's web platform tests (see
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1776711).
Original change's description:
> Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface.
>
> This change moves SctpTransport to be owned by JsepTransport, which now
> holds a DataChannelTransport implementation for SCTP when it is used for
> data channels.
>
> This simplifies negotiation and fallback to SCTP. Negotiation can now
> use a composite DataChannelTransport, just as negotiation for RTP uses a
> composite RTP transport.
>
> PeerConnection also has one fewer way it needs to manage data channels.
> It now handles SCTP and datagram- or media-transport-based data channels
> the same way.
>
> There are a few leaky abstractions left. For example, PeerConnection
> calls Start() on the SctpTransport at a particular point in negotiation,
> but does not need to call this for other transports. Similarly, PC
> exposes an interface to the SCTP transport directly to the user; there
> is no equivalent for other transports.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I64e94b88afb119fdbf5f22750f88c8a084d53937
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/151981
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29120}
This reverts commit 4c85828ab2.
Reason for revert:
Speculatively reverting this because it makes several web platform tests relating to RTCDataChannel flaky, see first failing roll:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1776711
Original change's description:
> Refactor SCTP data channels to use DataChannelTransportInterface.
>
> This change moves SctpTransport to be owned by JsepTransport, which now
> holds a DataChannelTransport implementation for SCTP when it is used for
> data channels.
>
> This simplifies negotiation and fallback to SCTP. Negotiation can now
> use a composite DataChannelTransport, just as negotiation for RTP uses a
> composite RTP transport.
>
> PeerConnection also has one fewer way it needs to manage data channels.
> It now handles SCTP and datagram- or media-transport-based data channels
> the same way.
>
> There are a few leaky abstractions left. For example, PeerConnection
> calls Start() on the SctpTransport at a particular point in negotiation,
> but does not need to call this for other transports. Similarly, PC
> exposes an interface to the SCTP transport directly to the user; there
> is no equivalent for other transports.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9719
> Change-Id: I0d3151c48c1a511368277981fc4cf818a9f8ebb4
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150341
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
> Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29012}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,mellem@webrtc.org,benwright@webrtc.org
Change-Id: I074b9e68f298d20d0cabb4239084b4843e76e910
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:9719
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150944
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29025}
This change moves SctpTransport to be owned by JsepTransport, which now
holds a DataChannelTransport implementation for SCTP when it is used for
data channels.
This simplifies negotiation and fallback to SCTP. Negotiation can now
use a composite DataChannelTransport, just as negotiation for RTP uses a
composite RTP transport.
PeerConnection also has one fewer way it needs to manage data channels.
It now handles SCTP and datagram- or media-transport-based data channels
the same way.
There are a few leaky abstractions left. For example, PeerConnection
calls Start() on the SctpTransport at a particular point in negotiation,
but does not need to call this for other transports. Similarly, PC
exposes an interface to the SCTP transport directly to the user; there
is no equivalent for other transports.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I0d3151c48c1a511368277981fc4cf818a9f8ebb4
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/150341
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Wright <benwright@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29012}
DatagramDtlsAdaptor wraps a DatagramTransport in a DtlsTransport. This
is only used by wrapping it again, in an RtpTransport. It is simpler to
just wrap DatagramTransport directly into an RtpTransport.
DatagramTransport is never used as a DtlsTransport, and doesn't support
most of the functionality exposed by the DtlsTransport interface.
However, it supports *all* the functionality of the RtpTransport, making
this a much cleaner fit.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: I699e8124ee4cb6c8c187162f9b444ff0431a4902
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/149400
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28921}
In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
Negotiation consists of four parts:
1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
any fields it might not have understood).
2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
- This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
- SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
3. JsepTransport/Controller:
- Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
- Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
- If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
provisionally selected transport.
- Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
keeps whichever transport is selected.
4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ifcc428c8d76fb77dcc8abaa79507c620bcfb31b9
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140920
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28198}
This reverts commit 71c6482baf.
Reason for revert: Lands too much at once and breaks downstream tests that need to implement new interfaces first.
Original change's description:
> Implement true negotiation for DatagramTransport with fallback to RTP.
>
> In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
> uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
> parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
> line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
>
> If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
> use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
> different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
>
> Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
> understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
> was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
> it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
> the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
>
> Negotiation consists of four parts:
> 1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
> perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
> any fields it might not have understood).
>
> 2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
> x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
> and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
> - This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
> - SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
> media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
>
> 3. JsepTransport/Controller:
> - Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
> pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
> answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
> - Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
> datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
> - If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
> provisionally selected transport.
> - Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
> keeps whichever transport is selected.
>
> 4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
>
> Bug: webrtc:9719
> Change-Id: Id8996eb1871e79d93b7923a5d7eb3431548c798d
> Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140700
> Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
> Reviewed-by: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28182}
TBR=steveanton@webrtc.org,mellem@webrtc.org,sukhanov@webrtc.org
Change-Id: I0d502c4a6d27516c35ed85154f3fa5869f88b3b7
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: webrtc:9719
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140822
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28188}
In short, the caller places a x-opaque line in SDP for each m= section that
uses datagram transport. If the answerer supports datagram transport, it will
parse this line and create a datagram transport. It will then echo the x-opaque
line into the answer (to indicate that it accepted use of datagram transport).
If the offer and answer contain exactly the same x-opaque line, both peers will
use datagram transport. If the x-opaque line is omitted from the answer (or is
different in the answer) they will fall back to RTP.
Note that a different x-opaque line in the answer means the answerer did not
understand something in the negotiation proto. Since WebRTC cannot know what
was misunderstood, or whether it's still possible to use the datagram transport,
it must fall back to RTP. This may change in the future, possibly by passing
the answer to the datagram transport, but it's good enough for now.
Negotiation consists of four parts:
1. DatagramTransport exposes transport parameters for both client and server
perspectives. The client just echoes what it received from the server (modulo
any fields it might not have understood).
2. SDP adds a x-opaque line for opaque transport parameters. Identical to
x-mt, but this is specific to datagram transport and goes in each m= section,
and appears in the answer as well as the offer.
- This is propagated to Jsep as part of the TransportDescription.
- SDP files: transport_description.h,cc, transport_description_factory.h,cc,
media_session.cc, webrtc_sdp.cc
3. JsepTransport/Controller:
- Exposes opaque parameters for each mid (m= section). On offerer, this means
pre-allocating a datagram transport and getting its parameters. On the
answerer, this means echoing the offerer's parameters.
- Uses a composite RTP transport to receive from either default RTP or
datagram transport until both offer and answer arrive.
- If a provisional answer arrives, sets the composite to send on the
provisionally selected transport.
- Once both offer and answer are set, deletes the unneeded transports and
keeps whichever transport is selected.
4. PeerConnection pulls transport parameters out of Jsep and adds them to SDP.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Id8996eb1871e79d93b7923a5d7eb3431548c798d
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/140700
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28182}
- This makes it consistent with ICE and MediaTransport ownership.
- Removes unnecessary datagram_transport() getter in DtlsTransportInternal
As a side effect this fixes bug in JsepTransportController, which moved datagram_transport to Dtls after creating it, then checked if (datagram_transport) to decide which RTP transport to create. As a result of this bug we were creating Sded instead of Unencrypted RTP with datagram transport.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ic5b13a450ce6ac5b2a20d388657e3949aabef079
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/139620
Commit-Queue: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28146}
It does not make sense for DtlsTransport to own ICE, and this arrangement will
not work when negotiating datagram or DTLS transport. During negotiation, both
a DTLS transport and a datagram transport need to be ready to receive from the
same ICE transport, depending on which protocol is chosen by the answerer. Once
the answerer chooses a protocol, the transport that is not chosen must be
deleted, but ICE must be left intact for use by the remaining transport.
Bug: webrtc:9719
Change-Id: Ibab969b574c981e3834ced71f8ff88008cb26a6c
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/139340
Reviewed-by: Anton Sukhanov <sukhanov@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Anton <steveanton@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Bjorn Mellem <mellem@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28113}
Semi-automatically created with:
git grep -l " testing::" | xargs sed -i "s/ testing::/ ::testing::/g"
git grep -l "(testing::" | xargs sed -i "s/(testing::/(::testing::/g"
git cl format
After this, two .cc files failed to compile and I have fixed them
manually.
Bug: webrtc:10523
Change-Id: I4741d3bcedc831b6c5fdc04485678617eb4ce031
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/132018
Reviewed-by: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27526}
Googletest recently started replacing the term Test Case by Test Suite.
From now on, the preferred API is TestSuite*; the older TestCase* API
will be slowly deprecated.
This CL moves WebRTC to the new set of APIs.
More info in [1].
This CL has been generated with this script:
declare -A items
items[TYPED_TEST_CASE]=TYPED_TEST_SUITE
items[TYPED_TEST_CASE_P]=TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P
items[REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P]=REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P
items[INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P]=INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_SUITE_P
items[INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P]=INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P
for i in "${!items[@]}"
do
git ls-files | xargs sed -i "s/\b$i\b/${items[$i]}/g"
done
git cl format
[1] - https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/primer.md#beware-of-the-nomenclature
Bug: None
Change-Id: I5ae191e3046caf347aeee01554d5743548ab0e3f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/118701
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26494}
