Running clang-format with chromium's style guide.
The goal is n-fold:
* providing consistency and readability (that's what code guidelines are for)
* preventing noise with presubmit checks and git cl format
* building on the previous point: making it easier to automatically fix format issues
* you name it
Please consider using git-hyper-blame to ignore this commit.
Bug: webrtc:9340
Change-Id: I694567c4cdf8cee2860958cfe82bfaf25848bb87
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/81185
Reviewed-by: Patrik Höglund <phoglund@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#23660}
- Two quality layers (same resolution, different bitrate).
- Max bitrate of low layer is limited to 200kbps. The choice of the
limit is driven by VP8 screen sharing which limits max bitrate of low
temporal layer to 200kbps. Using the same value for VP9 guarantees
that there will be no regressions for participants with limited
bandwidth.
- Max bitrate of high layer is limited to 500kbps. According to test
results this value is enough to get up to +5dB higher PSNR than VP8
SS provides on 1.2Mbps (max total bitrate for VP8 SS) link.
- Max total sent bitrate is limited to 700kbps. It is 500kbps lower
than that in VP8 SS (1200kbps).
Bug: webrtc:9261
Change-Id: I7919cc3933064664567c39e380a44cad0c65f1e8
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/76380
Commit-Queue: Sergey Silkin <ssilkin@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Erik Språng <sprang@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#23226}
Changed minimum bit rate threshold formula to raise the minimum bit rate
at which 720p video is presented in VP9 SVC to ensure that the video
quality for VP9 SVC is the same or better than VP8 SIM. The minimum bit
rate threshold values for lower resolutions remain largely unchanged.
Also changed maximum bit rate threshold formula to lower the maximum
bit rate for low resolutions (e.g., 180p) in order to ensure higher
frame rates when downlink bit rates are very low (e.g., < 100 kbps).
Bug: webrtc:9242
Change-Id: I8f9c76c9188b98f3fd40a608551b576b0c3b8f34
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/75244
Commit-Queue: Michael Horowitz <mhoro@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Holmer <stefan@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#23218}
This fixes misprint in the code which calculates target bitrate of a
VP9 spatial layer where "-" was used instead of "+".
Bug: none
Change-Id: I17d76a84d00e453c055c068968d7b276e9c23f51
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/71663
Commit-Queue: Sergey Silkin <ssilkin@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Rasmus Brandt <brandtr@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#22974}
The configurator decides number of spatial layers, their resolution
and bitrate thresholds based on given input resolution and maximum
number of spatial layers.
The allocator distributes available bitrate across spatial and
temporal layers. If there is not enough bitrate to provide acceptable
quality for all spatial layers allocator disables enhancement layers
one by one until the condition is met or number of layers is reduced
to one.
VP9 SVC related unit tests have been updated. Input resolution and
bitrate in these tests have been increased to the level enough to
provide desirable number of spatial layers.
Bug: webrtc:8518
Change-Id: I9df790920227c7f7dd4d42a50a856c22f0f4389b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/60340
Commit-Queue: Sergey Silkin <ssilkin@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Erik Språng <sprang@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Holmer <stefan@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Rasmus Brandt <brandtr@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Horowitz <mhoro@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#22672}
