This is a follow up for https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/360680.
* Adding some missing <optional> include.
* Adding a IWYU pragma to force keeping an include.
Note that I've added the CQ bot 'iwyu_verifier' to ensure the repo stays clean. It is still work in progress and it currently needs to be triggered manually.
FYI I used these command line to run iwyu:
> for i in api/*.cc; do ./tools_webrtc/iwyu/apply-include-cleaner $i; done
> for i in api/*.h; do ./tools_webrtc/iwyu/apply-include-cleaner $i; done
Change-Id: Ie7036d08edbb6884f2b35eb9d69646757d662390
Bug: webrtc:42226242
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/362440
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Jeremy Leconte <jleconte@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#43054}
The new type PriorityValue is a strong 16-bit integer matching RFC 8831
requirements that can be built from a Priority enum.
The value is now propagated and used by the SCTP transport, but enabling
the feature still requires a field trial for now.
Bug: webrtc:42225365
Change-Id: I56c9f48744c70999a8c2d01415a08a0b6761df4b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/357941
Commit-Queue: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#42695}
One problem with the existing Send() method is that it has a return
value that is problematic for a fully async implementation.
A second problem with Send() is that the return value is bool and not
RTCError (webrtc:13289), which is why OnSendComplete() uses RTCError.
Also, start deprecating `bool Send()` in favor of `void SendAsync()` and
adding `network_safety_` flag for posting async operations to the
network thread. This flag also takes over from the
`connected_to_transport_` which can now be removed.
Bug: webrtc:11547, webrtc:13289
Change-Id: I87bbc7e9b964a52684bdfe0e6ebc5230be254e8b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/299760
Reviewed-by: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Tomas Gunnarsson <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#39817}
Previous limits was only in a comment and users had no way to query it
from the API.
Bug: webrtc:13289
Change-Id: I6187dd9f9482bc3e457909c5e703ef1553d8ef15
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/235378
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#35224}
These parameters are nullable in the JS API.
This allows cleaner handling of "unset" vs "set" in Chrome.
Backwards compatibility note: Behavior should not change, even for users
who set the values explicitly to -1 in the DataChannelInit struct.
Those who try to read back the value will get a compile-time error.
Bug: chromium:854385
Change-Id: Ib488ca5f70bc24ba8b4a3f71b506434c4d2c60b2
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/131381
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27507}
