This is a prerequisite to implementing it externally.
Bug: webrtc:11525
Change-Id: I9cb3b4418396485d3eb9f25cafa51cbff6db7817
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/176401
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Holmer <stefan@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31418}
This will help show what the restrictions are before
and after they transform into sink wants.
These will not be so spammy as adaptations do not happen
very often.
Bug: None
Change-Id: Ib72b313f68c6934d7833d8a3f14ce00df602832b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/175800
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31341}
This CL is part of the Call-Level Adaptation Processing design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZyC26yOCknrrcYa839ZWLxD6o6Gig5A3lVTh4E41074/edit?usp=sharing
The ResourceListenerResponse was used to make the QualityScaler
not clear QP samples and instead increase its frequency of checking for
QP under certain circumstances, see enum description:
https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src.git/+/c70b1028d47c1aee4892545190cd66e97d09cd55/call/adaptation/resource.h#33
Because the QualityScaler depends on whether and how adaptation
happened it should listen to adaptation happening.
This CL moves the logic that was previously in VideoStreamAdapter closer
to the QualityScaler: QualityScalerResource::OnAdaptationApplied().
This would allow the VideoStreamAdapter to operate on a separate task
queue in the future, with no dependencies on any stream-specific
resources that might operate on other task queues.
Bug: webrtc:11172, webrtc:11521
Change-Id: I07971a8a5fab5715f4ccb7d2c63f1b92bd47170f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/173090
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31143}
This CL is part of the Call-Level Adaptation Processing design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZyC26yOCknrrcYa839ZWLxD6o6Gig5A3lVTh4E41074/edit?usp=sharing
The VideoStreamAdapter is currently responsible for aborting and not
providing adaptations if we are bitrate constrained
(kIsBitrateConstrained). Whether or not we are bitrate constrained is
clearly a resource question and should be phrased as such. By moving
this logic to Resource::IsAdaptationUpAllowed(), the VideoStreamAdapter
can continue to be thread-agnostic when a future CL introduces a
"processing queue", and the VideoStreamAdapter can be simplified: it
returns Adaptations even if we are constrained (but we refuse to Apply
them any resource rejects it).
This CL adds new Resource classes as inner classes of
ResourceAdaptationProcessor that take on the responsibility of
kIsBitrateConstrained logic:
PreventIncreaseResolutionDueToBitrateResource and
PreventAdaptUpInBalancedResource.
A third class, PreventAdaptUpDueToActiveCounts, also allows us to move
adaptation-aborting logic. This piece of code appears to be about not
adapting up if we’re already at the highest setting, which would be
VideoStreamAdapter responsibility (covered by
Adaptation::Status::kLimitReached), but it is actually more complicated
than that: the active_counts_ care about "reason", so it is really about
"is this resource type OK with you adapting up?". We should probably
rewrite this code in the future, but for now it is moved to an inner
class of ResourceAdaptationProcessor.
Other misc changes:
- ApplyDegradationPreference is moved to video_stream_adapter.[h/cc]
and renamed "Filter".
- OnResourceOveruse/Underuse now use Resource* as the reason instead of
AdaptReason. In a future CL, the processor will be split into a
"processor" part and a "video stream encoder resource manager" part.
Only the manager needs to know about AdaptReason since this is only
used for |active_counts_| and we want to get rid of it as much as
possible as it is not future-proof.
Bug: webrtc:11172
Change-Id: I2eba9ec3d717f7024c451aeb14635fe759551318
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/172930
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31099}
Adapting up or down is currently a "Maybe Adapt" method. In the future
we will want to be able to decide which stream to adapt, and as such we
need to be able to tell if a stream is able to do so.
This takes us one step in that direction, by refactoring
OveruseFrameDetectorResourceAdaptationModule::VideoSourceRestrictor's
methods to follow a simple pattern:
- What is the next step?
GetHigherFrameRateThan, GetLowerFrameRateThan,
GetHigherResolutionThan, GetLowerResolutionThan
- Can we adapt?
CanIncreaseFrameRate, CanDecreaseFrameRate,
CanIncreaseResolution, CanDecreaseResolution
- Do adapt!
IncreaseFrameRateTo, DecreaseFrameRateTo,
IncreaseResolutionTo, DecreaseResolutionTo
Hopefully this makes the code easier to follow.
This CL changes the "Request Higher/Lower" methods to take the target
as input instead of implicitly calculating the target from the current
input resolution or frame rate.
Bug: webrtc:11222
Change-Id: If625834e921a24a872145105f5d553fb8f9f1795
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/168966
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30600}
This is part of the work for making VideoStreamEncoder responsible for
configuring its source/sink and limiting the responsibility of
OveruseFrameDetectorResourceAdaptationModule to only output relevant
VideoSourceRestrictions.
BEFORE THIS CL
Prior to this CL, OveruseFrameDetector was responsible for performing
AddOrUpdateSink() on the source, which it did using its nested class
VideoSourceProxy.
AddOrUpdateSink() could happen for both adaptation and non-adaptation
related reasons. For example:
- Adaptation related: AdaptUp() or AdaptDown() happens, causing updated
VideoSourceRestrictions.
- Non-adaptation related: VideoStreamEncoder asks the module to
reconfigure the source/sink for it, such as with
SetMaxFramerateAndAlignment() or SetWantsRotationApplied().
AFTER THIS CL
AddOrUpdateSink() is performed by VideoSourceController, which is owned
by VideoStreamEncoder. Any reconfiguration has to go through the
VideoStreamEncoder. This means that:
- Non-adaptation related settings happen between VideoStreamEncoder and
VideoSourceController directly (without going through the adaptation
module).
- Adaptation related changes can be expressed in terms of
VideoSourceRestrictions. OveruseFrameDetectorResourceAdaptationModule
only has to output the restrictions and not know or care about other
source/sink settings.
For now, VideoSourceController has to know about DegradationPreference.
In a future CL, the DegradationPreference logic should move back to
the adaptation module. The VideoSourceRestrictions are fully capable of
expressing all possible source/sink values without the "modifier" that
is the degradation preference.
Bug: webrtc:11222
Change-Id: I0f058c4700ca108e2d9f212e38b61f6f728aa419
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/162802
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30228}
