Under zero-hertz mode, provided that a frame arrived to the
VideoStreamEncoder, the receiver may experience up to a second
between incoming frames. This results in key frame requests getting
serviced with that delay, which is undesired.
What's worse is also the fact that if no frame ever arrived to the
VideoStreamEncoder, it will not service the keyframe requests at all
until the first frame comes.
This change introduces VideoSourceInterface::RequestRefreshFrame
which results in a refresh frame being sent from complying sources.
The method is used under zero-hertz mode from the VideoStreamEncoder
when frames didn't arrive to it yet (with changes to the zero-hertz
adapter).
With this change, when the frame adapter has received at least one
frame, it will conditionally repeat the last frame in response to the
key frame request.
go/rtc-0hz-present
Bug: chromium:1255737
Change-Id: I6f97813b3a938747357d45e5dda54f759129b44d
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/242361
Reviewed-by: Erik Språng <sprang@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Markus Handell <handellm@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#35562}
This will allow us to optimize the internal buffers of
webrtc::VideoFrame for the resolution(s) that we actually want to
encode.
Bug: webrtc:12469, chromium:1157072
Change-Id: If378b52b5e35aa9a9800c1f7dfe189437ce43253
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/208540
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33342}
This turned out to be a bit complicated, mostly
related to the tests, but here's what's changed:
* No AsyncInvoker (and avoid ClearInternal) in
WebRtcVideoSendStream (WVSS)
* The reason it was there is due to a "design leak" from
VideoSourceSinkController/VideoStreamEncoder where the former uses
locks in all methods and is unaware of a threading model. That design
affected downstream objects, pushed the need for an async hop into
WVSS and added a lock.
A suggestion was made to address this in a follow-up change, here:
https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/165684
* All methods in VideoSourceSinkController are now called on a known
and checked sequence and this CL removes the lock. This also makes
checking state consistent (i.e. calling a getter twice in a row on the
same sequence, will always return the same value, avoiding race with
other threads).
* Handling of reporting state changes from the encoder queue to the
VSSC, is done by VideoStreamEncoder.
* VideoSendStreamImpl is still instantiated on the incorrect thread [1]
but has two initialization steps [2]. The second one already runs on
the right thread. Addressing that TODO [1] is something we should do
but it has side effects to consider. For the purposes of this CL
the steps relating to the encoder (setting the sink pointer) have
been moved to [2].
[1] https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/master:third_party/webrtc/video/video_send_stream.cc;l=94
[2] https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/master:third_party/webrtc/video/video_send_stream.cc;drc=f4a9991cce74a37d006438ec0e366313ed33162e;l=115
Bug: webrtc:11222, webrtc:11908
Change-Id: Ie46d46e3a52bbe225951b4bd580ecb8cc9cad873
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/184508
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32150}
This is a prerequisite to implementing it externally.
Bug: webrtc:11525
Change-Id: I9cb3b4418396485d3eb9f25cafa51cbff6db7817
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/176401
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Holmer <stefan@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31418}
This will help show what the restrictions are before
and after they transform into sink wants.
These will not be so spammy as adaptations do not happen
very often.
Bug: None
Change-Id: Ib72b313f68c6934d7833d8a3f14ce00df602832b
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/175800
Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31341}
The DegradationPreference logic is moved into
OveruseFrameDetectorResourceAdaptationModule. This makes the adaptation
module solely responsible for degradation preference, and the
VideoStreamEncoder the only bridge between the adaptation module and the
VideoSourceSinkController.
The adaptation module is now unaware of the existence of a controller.
It only "speaks" VideoSourceRestrictions, which is a big milestone in
making adaptation modules injectable.
A follow-up CL will explore the possibility of reconfiguring the
controller's source and which degradation preference to use to the
encoder queue. This would allow us to make several classes
single-threaded, but it is a change in behavior and should be done in a
separate CL.
Bug: webrtc:11222
Change-Id: Ib7f640e12789da5f801177926c2072a51818f261
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/165684
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30237}
This is part of the work for making VideoStreamEncoder responsible for
configuring its source/sink and limiting the responsibility of
OveruseFrameDetectorResourceAdaptationModule to only output relevant
VideoSourceRestrictions.
BEFORE THIS CL
Prior to this CL, OveruseFrameDetector was responsible for performing
AddOrUpdateSink() on the source, which it did using its nested class
VideoSourceProxy.
AddOrUpdateSink() could happen for both adaptation and non-adaptation
related reasons. For example:
- Adaptation related: AdaptUp() or AdaptDown() happens, causing updated
VideoSourceRestrictions.
- Non-adaptation related: VideoStreamEncoder asks the module to
reconfigure the source/sink for it, such as with
SetMaxFramerateAndAlignment() or SetWantsRotationApplied().
AFTER THIS CL
AddOrUpdateSink() is performed by VideoSourceController, which is owned
by VideoStreamEncoder. Any reconfiguration has to go through the
VideoStreamEncoder. This means that:
- Non-adaptation related settings happen between VideoStreamEncoder and
VideoSourceController directly (without going through the adaptation
module).
- Adaptation related changes can be expressed in terms of
VideoSourceRestrictions. OveruseFrameDetectorResourceAdaptationModule
only has to output the restrictions and not know or care about other
source/sink settings.
For now, VideoSourceController has to know about DegradationPreference.
In a future CL, the DegradationPreference logic should move back to
the adaptation module. The VideoSourceRestrictions are fully capable of
expressing all possible source/sink values without the "modifier" that
is the degradation preference.
Bug: webrtc:11222
Change-Id: I0f058c4700ca108e2d9f212e38b61f6f728aa419
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/162802
Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Nikolaevskiy <ilnik@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Shrubsole <eshr@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30228}
