At cost of removing assumption callbacks can't be used after destructor.
Bug: webrtc:8239
Change-Id: Id79f7553528cf6c102d3ee0bf7aa2de5b0437d2a
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/98860
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#24632}
As downside it disallows to destroy RtcpTransceiver on the TaskQueue
without prio call to the Stop function
BUG: webrtc:8239
Change-Id: I236b9aff7a0746044dd764c619174cc5ac03d27f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/98120
Commit-Queue: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Per Kjellander <perkj@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#24587}
With an extra interface it will allow to add both RtpRtcp module
and RtcpTransceiver as feedback sender to PacketRouter
Though hacky, this is very similar to currently used implementation
in the RTCPSender::SendFeedbackPacket
Bug: webrtc:8239
Change-Id: I237b422ae1594dede78cb63daa4aa42b6774d6fe
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/32680
Commit-Queue: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#21274}
in particular change bitrate type to int64_t to follow style guide.
With an extra interface it will allow to add both RtpRtcp module
and RtcpTransceiver as feedback sender to PacketRouter
Bug: webrtc:8239
Change-Id: I9ea265686d7cd2d709f0b42e8a983ebe1790a6ba
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/32302
Commit-Queue: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Philip Eliasson <philipel@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Erik Språng <sprang@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#21250}
