webrtc/api/README.md
Danil Chapovalov 541756ff6b Discourage structs in api
Structs make api harder to evolve:
deprecated unused properties,
change how data is represented.

Classes with accessors allow more graduated and safer api evolution.

Bug: None
Change-Id: I8ebd5e072d51cf7f5800666cfdac523d0f9a937f
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/317520
Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40714}
2023-09-07 10:41:49 +00:00

37 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<!-- go/cmark -->
<!--* freshness: {owner: 'hta' reviewed: '2021-01-01'} *-->
# How to write code in the `api/` directory
Mostly, just follow the regular [style guide](/g3doc/style-guide.md), but:
* Note that `api/` code is not exempt from the “`.h` and `.cc` files come in
pairs” rule, so if you declare something in `api/path/to/foo.h`, it should be
defined in `api/path/to/foo.cc`.
* Headers in `api/` should, if possible, not `#include` headers outside `api/`.
Its not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small
mountain of technical debt that were trying to shrink.
* `.cc` files in `api/`, on the other hand, are free to `#include` headers
outside `api/`.
* Avoid structs in api, prefer classes.
The preferred way for `api/` code to access non-`api/` code is to call
it from a `.cc` file, so that users of our API headers wont transitively
`#include` non-public headers.
For headers in `api/` that need to refer to non-public types, forward
declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The
usual [rules](/g3doc/style-guide.md#forward-declarations) still apply, though.
`.cc` files in `api/` should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a
substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public
code, and just call it from the `api/` `.cc` file.
Avoid defining api with structs as it makes harder for the api to evolve.
Your struct may gain invariant, or change how it represents data.
Evolving struct from the api is particular challenging as it is designed to be
used in other code bases and thus needs to be updated independetly from its usage.
Class with accessors and setters makes such migration safer.
See [Google C++ style guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Structs_vs._Classes) for more.
If you need to evolve existent struct in api, prefer first to convert it into a class.