mirror of
https://github.com/mollyim/webrtc.git
synced 2025-05-12 21:30:45 +01:00

Structs make api harder to evolve: deprecated unused properties, change how data is represented. Classes with accessors allow more graduated and safer api evolution. Bug: None Change-Id: I8ebd5e072d51cf7f5800666cfdac523d0f9a937f Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/317520 Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@webrtc.org> Commit-Queue: Danil Chapovalov <danilchap@webrtc.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#40714}
37 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
<!-- go/cmark -->
|
||
<!--* freshness: {owner: 'hta' reviewed: '2021-01-01'} *-->
|
||
|
||
# How to write code in the `api/` directory
|
||
|
||
Mostly, just follow the regular [style guide](/g3doc/style-guide.md), but:
|
||
|
||
* Note that `api/` code is not exempt from the “`.h` and `.cc` files come in
|
||
pairs” rule, so if you declare something in `api/path/to/foo.h`, it should be
|
||
defined in `api/path/to/foo.cc`.
|
||
* Headers in `api/` should, if possible, not `#include` headers outside `api/`.
|
||
It’s not always possible to avoid this, but be aware that it adds to a small
|
||
mountain of technical debt that we’re trying to shrink.
|
||
* `.cc` files in `api/`, on the other hand, are free to `#include` headers
|
||
outside `api/`.
|
||
* Avoid structs in api, prefer classes.
|
||
|
||
The preferred way for `api/` code to access non-`api/` code is to call
|
||
it from a `.cc` file, so that users of our API headers won’t transitively
|
||
`#include` non-public headers.
|
||
|
||
For headers in `api/` that need to refer to non-public types, forward
|
||
declarations are often a lesser evil than including non-public header files. The
|
||
usual [rules](/g3doc/style-guide.md#forward-declarations) still apply, though.
|
||
|
||
`.cc` files in `api/` should preferably be kept reasonably small. If a
|
||
substantial implementation is needed, consider putting it with our non-public
|
||
code, and just call it from the `api/` `.cc` file.
|
||
|
||
Avoid defining api with structs as it makes harder for the api to evolve.
|
||
Your struct may gain invariant, or change how it represents data.
|
||
Evolving struct from the api is particular challenging as it is designed to be
|
||
used in other code bases and thus needs to be updated independetly from its usage.
|
||
Class with accessors and setters makes such migration safer.
|
||
See [Google C++ style guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Structs_vs._Classes) for more.
|
||
|
||
If you need to evolve existent struct in api, prefer first to convert it into a class.
|